THE GUILD
READ ONLY ARCHIVE, NEW LOCATION www.guildwargamers.com
 
Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages

Log inLog in  RegisterRegister


Profile  Search  Memberlist  FAQ  Usergroups
Latest global searches: space between cells table ie7  feca builds ataque nebuloso  front mission 2  alix cancune  descarga de mu shilpyd 
Top global searches: free hosting  iso for playstation  hindi jokes  minnesota pigeon forum  philippine chess 
Lead Content of Minis

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    THE GUILD Forum Index -> General Chat
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Amalric
Dedicated


Joined: 13 Mar 2007
Posts: 191
Location: Tennessee

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 10:38 pm    Post subject: Lead Content of Minis Reply with quote

Gents

Are miniatures produced with lead anymore? Anywhere?
Most of the minis I'm working on recently were produced within the past 5 years and are from the US, UK or Spain.

This came to mind as I have 2 small children and I sat carving and filing on some minis.

Thanks All
Tom
_________________
I have a bad feeling about this...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
scruton
Dedicated


Joined: 12 Mar 2007
Posts: 96
Location: Minneapolis, MN

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 11:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tom:

Unless things have changed radically since the mid-1990s, the short answer is 'yes,' figures likely still contain 1-10% lead and, depending on the quality, a few percent bismuth and/or antimony. There may be a few producers doing miniature casting wholly in britannia (i.e., lead-free pewter) but, speaking from my experience as production manager at GHQ, it's a challenging metal to work with -- stiff, easily shattered, and notoriously hard on molds (both because of the stiffness of the resulting parts and the higher temperatures necessary to get high-tin alloys to flow adequately). We used it primarily for small, finicky, detail parts. For larger pieces, we generally used more common (i.e., higher lead-content) alloys -- in my early days with the company (1988-90 or thereabouts), my recollection of the mix is that is was somewhere in the 60% lead/40% tin range; after the New York health commission scare (they were contemplating banning all products that contained lead at all, whether they were aimed at children or not), we went briefly to an all-Britannia mix (which practically wiped the company out -- casting 24+ 6-inch USS Nimitz castings for a distributor restock would likely have been an all-day proposition, with a 50-75% discard rate). Once the threat of a New York ban had receded, my recollection is that we settled back to a mix somewhere in the territory of 70-80% tin/20-30% lead. I can't speak to what GHQ does now (or since 1995 for that matter), or for anyone else in the industry, so I'd be interested to hear what others use.

Depending on the skill of the caster and the purity of the metal used, one clue to the relative tin levels in castings that struck me during that period when we transitioned from high-lead to high-tin alloys is the distinctive 'tink' or 'click' they made when separating sprues from mold centers (or when straightening rifles or other bent parts); in extreme cases, it was an audible sound but, even when you couldn't hear it, you could feel it in your finger tips -- as if the part initially resisted straightening, then suddenly gave way. High lead parts, on the other hand, tend to bend freely and don't resist straightening or other manipulation (but they're also more easily deformed) . . . if you've have old 1970s Minifigs or similar in your collection (or any of the figures cast by basement manufacturers who used tire weights or similar), you'll no doubt have noticed this tendency. High-lead alloys also tend to have a dull, blue-ish cast while tinnier mixes are shinier and more silvery.

In my opinion, you're probably better safe than sorry (of course if, like me, you live in a house that's more than 50 years old, I'd be more worried about the radiators, windowsills/frames, etc. that were likely painted with lead-based paint . . . in seven years, my son has never shown much interest in my toy soldiers, but there was a time when some of those window sills were just right for gnawing).

Good luck!

Chris
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Amalric
Dedicated


Joined: 13 Mar 2007
Posts: 191
Location: Tennessee

PostPosted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 12:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Chris

Thank you for your excellent reply. We're fortunate that in our present house we don't have to worry about lead based paint. I also keep the girls away from the room where I do my modeling to minimized exposure.
They are more facinated with watching me paint.

Tom
_________________
I have a bad feeling about this...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sayeed
Established


Joined: 16 Mar 2007
Posts: 641
Location: sarf west london , UK

PostPosted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 11:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

handling wagames figures is a relative safe excercise ... the lead content is small and daily handling exposes only a very very tiny risk of heavy metal poisoning ..

for a gamer/painter/collector the most dangerous thing may be filing down figures and exposure to fine metal dust - buying a good dust mask and disposing of the filings securely will immediately solve any probs in this area ..

the real issues would be for anyone sucking or eating wargames figures on a regular basis or those who spend all day with their head over a melting pot making casting wargames figures .... Rolling Eyes
_________________
'' I wandered alone in the desert for an eternity , and then came upon a locust , I pulled off its wings , it died ............. ''
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Michi
Guild Respected


Joined: 09 Jul 2007
Posts: 1020
Location: Nürnberg

PostPosted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 12:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

sayeed wrote:
the most dangerous thing may be filing down figures and exposure to fine metal dust - buying a good dust mask and disposing of the filings securely will immediately solve any probs in this area ..


This is why I never use a file, but scratch flash or do conversions with a scalpel: No dust! Smile
I prefer higher lead contents as it makes reshaping by scratching easier.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
elhiem
Guild Respected


Joined: 07 Mar 2007
Posts: 1395
Location: Birmingham, UK

PostPosted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 12:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You have to consume a lot of white metal to get poisoned. I cast up tons of the stuff and had a blood test the other day and came back with the all clear.
_________________

the Guild : its like a bacon sarnie and a cup of sweet tea when you have a hangover!

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Amalric
Dedicated


Joined: 13 Mar 2007
Posts: 191
Location: Tennessee

PostPosted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 3:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the comments gents. I try hard not to suck or eat any of the miniatures. Michi, I to prefer to carve on minis instead of filing, but sometimes I need to file and clean up afterwards.

Tom
_________________
I have a bad feeling about this...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
scruton
Dedicated


Joined: 12 Mar 2007
Posts: 96
Location: Minneapolis, MN

PostPosted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Amalric wrote:
I try hard not to suck or eat any of the miniatures


The thing to be particularly careful about is clean-up after filing/scraping -- lead dust gets everywhere and can be very difficult to clean sufficiently. If possible, I'd avoid doing figure cleaning in common spaces unless you have a vacuum cleaner with a HEPA filter or similar (otherwise you may just be making the dust airborne and spreading it around). It's easy to get blase around the stuff -- I knew plenty of casters who'd smoke in the casting room . . . easy enough to understand given the unpleasant smell of a working foundry, but they'd invariably forget to wash their hands before touching the cigarette and then putting it to their lips (sadly, some weren't any more careful with their eating habits . . . so the idea of 'eating minis' may not be so far fetched).

As Rolfe says, the most dangerous form of exposure is to oxidizing lead -- hanging out with your head over a pot or drossing (lighting glycerine-infused wax to draw impurities to the surface and skim them off). Having cast and picked miniatures 10 hours a day, 5-6 days a week for almost 7 years and never having even a mildly elevated heavy metal test, I'm sure it would take pretty extreme exposure to pose a risk for most people.

Chris
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Amalric
Dedicated


Joined: 13 Mar 2007
Posts: 191
Location: Tennessee

PostPosted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

scruton wrote:
I'm sure it would take pretty extreme exposure to pose a risk for most people.


I'm mainly concerned with my children's exposure to lead as a result of my hobby.

Thanks Again Gents
Tom
_________________
I have a bad feeling about this...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jklm307
Traveller


Joined: 07 Jan 2009
Posts: 5

PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 6:01 pm    Post subject: take heart of grace Reply with quote

take heart of grace
_________________
buy world of warcraft gold - wow gold
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    THE GUILD Forum Index -> General Chat All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

phpBB "skin" by DewChugr


© 2007-2008 Informe.com. Get Free Forum Hosting
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Software tags powered by Software Informer ::